Law firm seeks lead plaintiff in Microvast securities fraud case
The notice alleges false or misleading statements about Microvast’s margins, inventory issues, customer rollout delays and Huzhou Phase 3.2 expansion.
A law firm says investors who lost money in Microvast Holdings Inc. may seek to lead a securities fraud class action over alleged false or misleading statements about the company’s margins, inventory issues, customer rollout delays and Huzhou Phase 3.2 expansion.
The notice sets a Sept. 21, 2026, deadline for investors who want to ask a court to serve as lead plaintiff in the case. It is an attorney advertisement and reflects allegations in a complaint, not findings by a court.
According to the Aug. 28, 2026, notice from the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, the proposed class period runs from April 1, 2025, through March 16, 2026. The complaint alleges that unnamed defendants made materially false or misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about Microvast’s business, operations and prospects.
The notice says the alleged misstatements included claims about the company’s ability to meet margin targets despite inventory management issues and delays in commercial vehicle rollouts by customers. It also says the defendants overstated Microvast’s ability to complete the Huzhou Phase 3.2 expansion by the end of 2025.
The press release says positive statements about the company’s business, operations and prospects were allegedly misleading or lacked a reasonable basis. It gives investors contact information for the Bensalem, Pennsylvania-based law firm and says class members do not need to take action now. Investors may retain counsel of their choice or remain absent members of the class action.
The notice says it may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.
What happens next depends on whether investors seek lead-plaintiff status before the Sept. 21 deadline and how the court handles the class action allegations.
Sources
Editorial note: This article was prepared with AI assistance and includes source attribution for reader review.
Comments ()