Rosen Law says Bloom Energy investors may lead securities fraud case

ENERGY INNOVATION (IA gov.gpo.fdsys.CHRG-110shrg49738)

Rosen Law Firm says Bloom Energy investors who bought shares during a stated class period may ask to lead a securities fraud lawsuit, with a Sept. 28, 2026, deadline to move the court.

Rosen Law Firm says investors who bought Bloom Energy Corporation securities between Feb. 27, 2025, and July 8, 2026, may seek to lead a securities fraud class action. The deadline to move the court to serve as lead plaintiff is Sept. 28, 2026.

The notice says Bloom Energy trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker BE. It says investors who bought during the stated class period may be able to pursue compensation through the case, and that no class has been certified.

According to the firm’s notice, the lawsuit alleges that Bloom Energy obtained scandium through intermediaries that sourced the metal from China and understated how much it relied on scandium from China. The notice also says the defendants made positive statements about Bloom Energy’s business, operations and prospects that were allegedly misleading or lacked a reasonable basis.

Rosen’s notice says the class action has already been filed. It also says an investor does not need to serve as lead plaintiff to share in any potential future recovery, and that any lead plaintiff would act on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

The firm said investors may seek compensation without out-of-pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The notice also provided a website link, a toll-free phone number for Phillip Kim, Esq., and an email address for people seeking information about the case.

The notice is dated Aug. 31, 2026. The stated class period begins on Feb. 27, 2025, and ends on July 8, 2026. The deadline to move the court to serve as lead plaintiff is Sept. 28, 2026.

Rosen Law Firm described itself in the notice as a global investor rights law firm concentrating on securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. The notice also included promotional content about the firm’s past rankings and recoveries.

Sources

Editorial note: This article was prepared with AI assistance and includes source attribution for reader review.

View the Web StoryA visual, tap-through version of this report

Share

This is the AMP version of the article. Read the full article on Atlas Watchline.